I haven't taken the very first look at the actual code, so less "issue" and more "question" here:
Would it be feasible to re-enable the warning, and silencing it (where unwanted) either with pragmas, or by indirecting the "offending" (but best available) function calls into a separate inlined function that does nothing but forward to the warned-about call, with //NOLINT applied?
I haven't taken the very first look at the actual code, so less "issue" and more "question" here:
Would it be feasible to re-enable the warning, and silencing it (where unwanted) either with pragmas, or by indirecting the "offending" (but best available) function calls into a separate inlined function that does nothing but forward to the warned-about call, with //NOLINT applied?