You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering whether this is the best approach. Possible options include:
Keep the current behaviour. Use tform for (a) and (c)-(e). (b) results in an error.
Install both the form and tform binaries. Use form for (a) and (c)-(e). Use tform for (b).
Install both the form and tform binaries. For (a)-(e), automatically choose between form and tform depending on whether -wN is passed as a command-line argument.
The function name in (d) could perhaps be run rather than form.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Currently,
pip install form-bininstalls a wrapper script namedform, but the wrapper actually invokestform(a stripped binary):For the current implementation, see form-dev/form-pypi.
I'm wondering whether this is the best approach. Possible options include:
tformfor (a) and (c)-(e). (b) results in an error.formandtformbinaries. Useformfor (a) and (c)-(e). Usetformfor (b).formandtformbinaries. For (a)-(e), automatically choose betweenformandtformdepending on whether-wNis passed as a command-line argument.The function name in (d) could perhaps be
runrather thanform.Any thoughts?
All reactions