[geo-optimizer] GEO Audit Report — 2026-07-10 #44801
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-07-13T17:08:27.103Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
GEO Audit Report — github/gh-aw
Audit Date: 2026-07-10
Run: §29109438801
📊 Scores
github.github.com/gh-aw/)github.com/github/gh-aw)✅ Top Strengths
llms.txtfile providing AI indexing structure.🚨 Critical Gaps
github.github.com/gh-aw/./llms.txton the docs site means AI systems cannot discover structured content organization./.well-known/ai.txt,/ai/summary.json,/ai/faq.json, and/ai/service.jsonon both targets.githubat 2.8% density on README), 13 broken links on README, hidden text on docs site.🔧 Recommended Fixes
Ordered by estimated impact:
robots.txtwith AI bot allow rules to docs site — Explicitly permit GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot. Recovers up to 20 points on docs site score./llms.txton docs site — Rungeo llms --base-url https://github.github.com/gh-awto generate. Recovers up to 20 points on docs site score./.well-known/ai.txt,/ai/summary.json,/ai/faq.json,/ai/service.json. Recovers up to 10+ points.WebSite,Organization, andFAQPageschemas. The README scores 0/20 for schema.githubdensity (2.8%) in README content.display:none/visibility:hiddencontent.<head>for AI discovery.<link rel="canonical">— Prevents duplicate-content issues during AI indexing.📋 Full Breakdown by Category
Docs Site (
github.github.com/gh-aw/) — Score 43/100README (
github.com/github/gh-aw) — Score 55/100📄 Sitemap Page Scores (Top 10 of 20 pages audited)
All 20 audited pages fall in the Foundation band (35–44). No page reaches Good (60+). The
/aboutpage is the only Critical scorer.Automated audit powered by geo-optimizer-skill · Run logs
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions