We looked at 3 open PRs — 2 look great and are ready for review, and 1 needs a closer look before it's ready.
(Note: pr-filter-results.json was not found; PRs were sourced directly from the open PR list.)
Ready to review 🟢
These PRs passed all contribution checks and are looking good for maintainer eyes.
| PR |
Title |
Author |
Lines |
Quality |
| #23608 |
feat: add trusted-users to MCP Gateway guard policy |
@Copilot |
401 |
lgtm ✨ |
| #23509 |
feat: add shared/apm.md shared workflow with Microsoft APM support |
@Copilot |
4985 |
lgtm ✨ |
Needs a closer look 🟡
These PRs are aligned with the project but have gaps that should be addressed first.
| PR |
Title |
Author |
Lines |
Quality |
| #23611 |
MCP Gateway: Add upstream OIDC authentication to schema, spec, compiler |
@Copilot |
211 |
needs-work |
#23611 details: Great direction — OIDC auth for HTTP MCP servers is well in scope. Missing test coverage for the new auth field parsing/rendering, and two correctness gaps: auth on stdio servers is silently ignored (should be a validation error), and auth.type is not validated against the "github-oidc" enum. Feedback posted to the PR.
Evaluated: 3 · Skipped: unknown · Run: 23775795700
Generated by Contribution Check · ◷
We looked at 3 open PRs — 2 look great and are ready for review, and 1 needs a closer look before it's ready.
(Note:
pr-filter-results.jsonwas not found; PRs were sourced directly from the open PR list.)Ready to review 🟢
These PRs passed all contribution checks and are looking good for maintainer eyes.
@Copilot@CopilotNeeds a closer look 🟡
These PRs are aligned with the project but have gaps that should be addressed first.
@Copilot#23611 details: Great direction — OIDC auth for HTTP MCP servers is well in scope. Missing test coverage for the new
authfield parsing/rendering, and two correctness gaps:authon stdio servers is silently ignored (should be a validation error), andauth.typeis not validated against the"github-oidc"enum. Feedback posted to the PR.Evaluated: 3 · Skipped: unknown · Run: 23775795700