-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
Bug Report for Memory Consumption #5532
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Description
Bug Report for https://neetcode.io/problems/reverse-a-linked-list
Please describe the bug below and include any steps to reproduce the bug or screenshots if possible.
Having the following solution on my end:
class Solution {
public:
ListNode* reverseList(ListNode* head) {
ListNode* prev = nullptr;
auto cur = head;
while (cur) {
auto temp = cur->next;
cur->next = prev;
prev = cur;
cur = temp;
}
return prev;
}
};I have received 148 MBs from the grading system. Here is the exact report:
Memory: 148.1 MB
Time: 2ms
Submitted at: 02/27/2026 17:09
Then I saw that there are better submissions in terms of memory allocation, and I checked the code:
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* struct ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode *next;
* ListNode() : val(0), next(nullptr) {}
* ListNode(int x) : val(x), next(nullptr) {}
* ListNode(int x, ListNode *next) : val(x), next(next) {}
* };
*/
class Solution {
public:
ListNode* reverseList(ListNode* head) {
if(!head || !head->next)return head;
ListNode* prev=NULL;
ListNode* node=head;
while(node!=NULL){
ListNode* front=node->next;
node->next=prev;
prev=node;
node=front;
}
// head=node;
return prev;
}
};For that submission we have the following: Runtime: 2ms Memory: 1.1 MB.
How is it possible that similar solutions have such big difference in Memory allocation? Given that I use auto, which is compiler feature? Am I missing something here, or there is a bug in the grading and measuring process?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels