Ever since the early days, the XBlock base class has defined a name field:
|
name = String(help="Short name for the block", scope=Scope.settings) |
This is different than the display_name field which edx-platform expects.
Is this used anywhere? Can we delete it?
Related... can we elevate display_name up to the XBlock base class without breaking backwards compatibility?
Ever since the early days, the XBlock base class has defined a
namefield:XBlock/xblock/core.py
Line 683 in 9d9c1c9
This is different than the
display_namefield which edx-platform expects.Is this used anywhere? Can we delete it?
Related... can we elevate
display_nameup to the XBlock base class without breaking backwards compatibility?