Skip to content

docs(readme): ground claims in the bench; add Detection scope#29

Merged
svczero merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-detection-scope
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

docs(readme): ground claims in the bench; add Detection scope#29
svczero merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-detection-scope

Conversation

@svczero

@svczero svczero commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Uses the bench's demonstrated capabilities (and limits) to re-ground the README's top-of-page claims.

  • Replaces No more false positives. No more missed backdoors. (the bench shows 0% FP is not a proven catch rate, ~1/10 call sites cede to dynamic dispatch, and there's a deletion-attack blind spot) with honest framing.
  • Adds a Detection scope section: what's demonstrably caught (exec/net/syscall introductions via labeled synthetic pairs), where it hands off (interface/dynamic dispatch), and the named limitations -- including the deletion-attack blind spot.

No capability claims beyond what the bench demonstrates; no marketing of unreleased features.

Replace "No more false positives. No more missed backdoors." -- contradicted by
the bench's own results -- with an honest framing, and add a Detection scope
section: what the deterministic engine demonstrably catches (exec/net/syscall
capability introductions, validated on labeled synthetic pairs), where it cedes
to a judgment layer (interface/dynamic dispatch), and what it does not score:
the deletion-attack blind spot (scores additions, not removed guards), the
parse-coverage tax, and that a clean FP rate is not a proven catch rate.
@svczero svczero merged commit d021426 into main Jun 11, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant