Skip to content

feat(registry): add SPAKE2 (RFC 9382) and SPAKE2+ (RFC 9383) #798

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Mehrn0ush wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+30 −0
Open

feat(registry): add SPAKE2 (RFC 9382) and SPAKE2+ (RFC 9383) #798

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions schema/cryptography-defs.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1047,6 +1047,36 @@
}
]
},
{
"family": "SPAKE2",
"standard": [
{
"name": "RFC9382",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9382"
}
],
"variant": [
{
"pattern": "SPAKE2[-{group}][-{hashFunction}][-{kdf}][-{mac}]",
"primitive": "key-agree"
}
]
},
{
"family": "SPAKE2PLUS",
Copy link
Contributor

@bhess bhess Feb 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: does it make sense to also call it SPAKE2+ to match the patterns?

"standard": [
{
"name": "RFC9383",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9383"
}
],
"variant": [
{
"pattern": "SPAKE2+[-{group}][-{hashFunction}][-{kdf}][-{mac}]",
"primitive": "key-agree"
}
]
},
{
"family": "TUAK",
"standard": [
Expand Down