Skip to content

Conversation

@tpoliaw
Copy link

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented Jan 21, 2026

Having the source and repo link as a 'normal' row makes it clearer what
is going on and stops 'Source' looking like a description of the other
link types.

Having the source and repo link as a 'normal' row makes it clearer what
is going on and stops 'Source' looking like a description of the other
link types.

Keeping each if/endif pair on the same line as the row it's gating makes
the template easier to read. The generated readme is unchanged.
@tpoliaw tpoliaw requested a review from coretl January 21, 2026 17:12
@tpoliaw tpoliaw changed the title Reformat link table template in README refactor: Reformat link table template in README Jan 22, 2026
@coretl
Copy link
Contributor

coretl commented Feb 2, 2026

Happy with the What/Where change, but not with the whitespace changes.
Requirements for the expanded template:

  • If docker==False or similar, there should be no empty line in the table
  • For each row in the table, the cell widths should be the same as the previous row

The only way I could find to make this happen was the contorted {% ... %} syntax that was in there before

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Author

tpoliaw commented Feb 2, 2026

Turns out when you use a local clone of a template, copier still uses a tagged version not the checked out version. Have reverted the contortions but left the if true blocks replaced with comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants