Skip to content

Conversation

@ZJvandeWeg
Copy link
Member

Description

I've come around to reference checks, let's start doing them.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • I have considered the performance impact of these changes
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
  • For blog PRs, an Art Request has been created (instructions)

@ZJvandeWeg ZJvandeWeg requested a review from allthedoll December 9, 2025 07:25
@ZJvandeWeg ZJvandeWeg changed the title Zj ref checks Add reference checks to the hiring process Dec 9, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for flowforge-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d3a7d0d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/flowforge-website/deploys/6937cf092060ba0008a0f1a2
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4205--flowforge-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 79 (🟢 up 19 from production)
Accessibility: 80 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for flowforge-website ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5997deb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/flowforge-website/deploys/696670be2c5ada0008f586ca
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4205--flowforge-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 87 (🟢 up 32 from production)
Accessibility: 80 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@allthedoll allthedoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a strong v1 addition to the handbook! ✨

Changes in this review focus on clarifying intent and improving usability so reference checks are lightweight, humane, and used as context rather than a gate. ❤️

Key updates:

  • Reframed reference checks as a late-stage input that validates interview signals and informs onboarding, not a hiring veto
  • Added flexibility around number and source of references (especially for currently employed candidates)
  • Clarified preference for live conversations over async forms
  • Tightened and humanized reference questions so they can be read aloud verbatim, using the candidate’s name
  • Removed overly evaluative language (rankings/percentiles) in favor of comparative, example-driven prompts
  • Added guardrails around optional "backdoor" references
  • Explicitly tied reference insights to onboarding and early manager check-ins

Overall, this keeps reference checks high-signal and low-burden while reinforcing manager judgment and onboarding responsibility. 💪🏼

@allthedoll
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been left hanging so I went ahead and committed my suggestions and we can iterate. 💅🏼

@allthedoll allthedoll enabled auto-merge January 13, 2026 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants