Allow uint64 indices in dpt.take_along_axis and dpt.put_along_axis

[ndgrigorian]

This PR proposes allowing indices of type uint64 in take_along_axis and put_along_axis.

With current behavior, these functions build a list of indices using the default index type. If the input indices are uint64 and the input array is of dimension greater than 1, when the padded indices are constructed, the function will fail if the default index type is int64.

Edit: Closes gh-1936

• Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
• Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
• Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
• Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
• Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
• Have you added documentation for your changes, if necessary?
• Have you added your changes to the changelog?
• If this PR is a work in progress, are you opening the PR as a draft?

[github-actions]

Deleted rendered PR docs from intelpython.github.com/dpctl, latest should be updated shortly. 🤞

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.19.0dev0=py310h93fe807_323 ran successfully.
Passed: 894
Failed: 2
Skipped: 118

[coveralls]

coverage: 87.659%. remained the same
when pulling 7602b4f on permit-uint64-indices-along-axis-fns
into 0bcd635 on master.

[oleksandr-pavlyk]

Overall this looks good to me, modulo nits.

@vtavana It would be nice if an issue existed motivating this change.

[vtavana]

Created issue #1936 which is now resolved with this PR. Thank you, @ndgrigorian!

[oleksandr-pavlyk]

Thank you @ndgrigorian

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.19.0dev0=py310h93fe807_331 ran successfully.
Passed: 895
Failed: 1
Skipped: 118