Open
Conversation
d938f39 to
043f684
Compare
9207641 to
7ccc9d1
Compare
7ccc9d1 to
589ef20
Compare
589ef20 to
20f2a3e
Compare
20f2a3e to
26e7b57
Compare
containing multiassets are valid
26e7b57 to
8e3b389
Compare
carbolymer
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| txinCollateral <- findLargestUtxoForPaymentKey epochStateView sbe wallet1 | ||
|
|
||
| void $ execCli' execConfig | ||
| [ anyEraToString anyEra, "query", "utxo" |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in general you can use epoch state to query utxo, it's a little faster
carbolymer
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| let prettyTxFile = work </> "spend-script-utxo-tx-view.json" | ||
| void $ execCli' execConfig ["debug", "transaction", "view", "--tx-file", spendScriptUTxOTx, "--out-file", prettyTxFile] | ||
|
|
||
| txPrettyJson :: Aeson.Value <- H.leftFailM . H.readJsonFile $ prettyTxFile |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| txPrettyJson :: Aeson.Value <- H.leftFailM . H.readJsonFile $ prettyTxFile | |
| txPrettyJson :: Aeson.Value <- H.readJsonFileOk prettyTxFile |
carbolymer
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| unsignedUnlockTx | ||
| [Some $ paymentKeyInfoPair wallet1] | ||
|
|
||
| submitTx execConfig cEra signedUnlockTx |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you could check for the new outputs in utxo set to double check that the transaction was accepted by ledger
carbolymer
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| , "--out-file", spendScriptUTxOTx | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| void $ execCli' execConfig |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you could check for the new outputs in utxo set to double check that the transaction was accepted by ledger
carbolymer
reviewed
Feb 13, 2026
| , "--tx-out", Text.unpack (paymentKeyInfoAddr wallet1) <> "+" <> show @Int 10_000_000 | ||
| , "--protocol-params-file", work </> "pparams.json" | ||
| , "--out-file", "test_addr_registration_certificate_order[build_estimate-submit_api]_ci2_hcrhrg_tx.body" | ||
| ] No newline at end of file |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would it make sense to check for the estimate value if it has changed?
carbolymer
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add your description here, if it fixes a particular issue please provide a
link
to the issue.
Checklist
See Runnings tests for more details
CHANGELOG.mdfor affected package.cabalfiles are updatedhlint. See.github/workflows/check-hlint.ymlto get thehlintversionstylish-haskell. See.github/workflows/stylish-haskell.ymlto get thestylish-haskellversionghc-9.6andghc-9.12Note on CI
If your PR is from a fork, the necessary CI jobs won't trigger automatically for security reasons.
You will need to get someone with write privileges. Please contact IOG node developers to do this
for you.