Skip to content

ci(python): require full runtime mutation matrix - #370

Merged
swkeever merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
skeever/python-full-mutmut-matrix
Sep 24, 2026
Merged

swkeever merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
skeever/python-full-mutmut-matrix

Conversation

@swkeever

@swkeever swkeever commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Require the complete handwritten Python runtime inventory to pass native Mutmut on every PR. CI assigns all 24 modules to native selectors; Mutation Gate requires every result, and Quality Gate also requires Python 3.11–3.14 checks. Local poe quality runs the same inventory. Missing reports, survivors, uncovered code, timeouts, crashes, and incomplete runs fail. Statically invalid mutants and functionless modules are reported separately.

The cleanup preserves connection-string query fields and zero-window realtime batching. Native URL/string operations remove equivalent parser branches, and strict eager pairing validates fetch result counts before delivery. Deterministic tests cover cancellation, queue accounting, batching defaults, capacity, credential preservation, upload termination, and durable retry configuration. Existing pytest-order support runs bounded defect assertions before scenarios that could otherwise hang.

Validation: the complete 24-module CI matrix and required Quality Gate pass on 37fe230. Canonical poe checks passes with 2,264 tests, 100% runtime line/branch coverage, strict lint/types, deterministic generation, and isolated wheel/sdist/optional-dependency/type consumers. Exact-head Codex code and security reviews report no findings. Shared scenarios are unchanged; Hosting’s static contract and SDK harness tests passed with Hosting #1315.

@swkeever

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

Please review commit e730089. Canonical checks and complete local parser/worker mutation gates pass; the full 24-module CI matrix is running. Review cycle 1 of 3.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-24T16:45:47.096524Z 37fe230 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-24T16:47:45.214000Z 37fe230 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: e730089691

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e730089691

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@swkeever

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

Please review exact head 49e73ec. The previous head received clean code and security reviews. Its final durable mutation job exposed one timeout when the wrapper dropped retry=False; this update adds a direct native StepConfig assertion before any scheduling. The exact mutant is now killed with zero timeout, and the full canonical checks pass (2263 tests, 100% runtime coverage). All 23 other runtime module mutation jobs passed on the preceding head. This is review cycle 2 of 3.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 49e73ec2d9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 49e73ec2d9

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@swkeever

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

Please review exact head 37fe230. Both prior code and security reviews were clean. The new full CI run exposed two additional timeout paths: a dropped bootstrap refresh token reached an indirect refresh scenario before its direct assertion, and an inverted EOF check repeatedly read an empty upload stream. Existing bootstrap assertions now run first, and a bounded EOF source rejects a second terminal read. Both exact mutants are killed with zero timeout. All canonical checks pass (2264 tests,100% runtime coverage). This is review cycle3.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: 37fe230a5b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 37fe230a5b

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@swkeever
swkeever marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2026 17:02
@swkeever
swkeever requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2026 17:02
@swkeever
swkeever merged commit 39aeb80 into main Sep 24, 2026
34 checks passed
@swkeever
swkeever deleted the skeever/python-full-mutmut-matrix branch September 24, 2026 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant