Search results

this may not be the best place to do this validation

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#322 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Dec 23, 2025

we should actually use the room state to validate the power levels

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#320 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Dec 18, 2025

check if all sendEventToAllServersInRoom should be followed by an emitter

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#304 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Nov 21, 2025

return only the IDs, not the full events

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#277 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 12, 2025

fgetser

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#271 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 9, 2025

remove this

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#264 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

use IStateService

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#263 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

exclude memberships here

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#261 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

1. Is a valid event, otherwise it is dropped. For an event to be valid, it must contain a room_id, and it must comply with the event format of that room version.

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#260 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

this is a very vague method, better would be to use exactly what needed,

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#259 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

change to debug later

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#258 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025

separate flag for soft fail?

todo 🗒️

Status: Open.

#257 In RocketChat/homeserver;

· github-actions opened on Oct 7, 2025