Skip to content

Conversation

@gokul000410
Copy link

This project/file contains a solution to the Merge Intervals problem, a common coding interview problem.

Problem Statement:
Given a collection of intervals, merge all overlapping intervals and return a list of non-overlapping intervals that cover all the intervals in the input.

Example:

Input: [[1,3],[2,6],[8,10],[15,18]]
Output: [[1,6],[8,10],[15,18]]

Key Points:

Handles overlapping intervals efficiently.

Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting.

Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the merged intervals.

Usage:

The solution can be directly tested with custom interval inputs.

Ideal for practice in coding interviews and algorithm learning.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Dec 15, 2025
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Dec 15, 2025
Updated type hints from List to built-in list for compatibility.
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Dec 15, 2025
Copy link

@shivaganesht shivaganesht left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent contribution! The Merge Intervals solution is well-implemented and addresses a classic interview problem effectively.

Strengths:

  1. Clear type hints with list[list[int]] specification
  2. Good documentation explaining the algorithm approach
  3. Handles edge cases properly
  4. Time complexity O(n log n) due to sorting is optimal

Code quality:

  • Function signature is clear and type-safe
  • Comments explain the merging logic well
  • Variable names are descriptive

Suggestion: Consider adding a docstring with:n- Example usage

  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Edge cases handled

This is a solid addition to the arrays collection!

gokul000410 and others added 2 commits December 15, 2025 04:19
Added edge cases handling and updated complexity notes.
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Dec 15, 2025
Updated type hints and docstring formatting in merge_intervals function.
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

"""

if not intervals:
return []

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An error occurred while parsing the file: data_structures/arrays/merge_intervals.py

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/render/project/src/algorithms_keeper/parser/python_parser.py", line 146, in parse
    reports = lint_file(
              ^^^^^^^^^^
libcst._exceptions.ParserSyntaxError: Syntax Error @ 42:5.
parser error: error at 41:4: expected one of (, *, +, -, ..., AWAIT, DEDENT, False, NAME, NUMBER, None, True, [, break, continue, lambda, match, not, pass, ~

        return []
    ^

gokul000410 and others added 2 commits December 15, 2025 04:32
Updated docstring formatting and improved error message clarity.
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Dec 15, 2025
@gokul000410
Copy link
Author

Excellent contribution! The Merge Intervals solution is well-implemented and addresses a classic interview problem effectively.

Strengths:

  1. Clear type hints with list[list[int]] specification
  2. Good documentation explaining the algorithm approach
  3. Handles edge cases properly
  4. Time complexity O(n log n) due to sorting is optimal

Code quality:

  • Function signature is clear and type-safe
  • Comments explain the merging logic well
  • Variable names are descriptive

Suggestion: Consider adding a docstring with:n- Example usage

  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Edge cases handled

This is a solid addition to the arrays collection!

Thank you for the suggestion! I have updated the merge_intervals function as follows:

  • Added input validation to raise ValueError for invalid intervals (e.g., [[]])
  • Handled edge cases: empty list, single interval, fully overlapping intervals
  • Enhanced docstring with detailed explanation, examples, and time/space complexity

Please let me know if any further changes are needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants