You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Name and define the AF OSS adoption tiers, plus the criteria for placement and promotion between them. This anchors how every intake decision categorizes a project.
Current working model (2026-04-23 Tier Model)
Tier
Working name
Definition
Examples
1
Foundation-Owned
Repo under agenticsorg; Foundation controls merge, CI, CLA
community-projects, OIA-Model
2
Foundation-Endorsed
Repo stays with author; Foundation certifies CI, CLA, review SLA
ruflo, RuVector, RuView
3
Community-Associated
Listed in ecosystem, no guarantees (default state)
nagual-qe, agentic-qe, Video Sync, Summary Bot
Open naming question
Proposed simplification: Owned / Endorsed / Affiliated (vs the current Foundation-Owned / Foundation-Endorsed / Community-Associated).
Also pending: a "rings of adoption" framing to remove the status-hierarchy connotation. Concentric model: inner ring (Owned) is AF at the center, outer ring (Affiliated) is AF-blessed but independent.
To decide
Tier names: Owned / Endorsed / Affiliated, vs current names, vs rings-of-adoption framing.
Precise definition of each tier.
Placement criteria: how a project lands in a tier (default to repo location: agenticsorg implies Owned; author namespace implies Endorsed or Affiliated).
Promotion criteria: Affiliated to Endorsed adds CI + CLA + review SLA; Endorsed to Owned transfers the repo to agenticsorg.
Activity
michaeloboyle commentedon Jun 3, 2026
All tiers open for discussion and renaming.
Attestation: command processed on issue #10
Attestation: command processed on issue #10
Attestation: command processed on issue #10
Attestation: command processed on issue #10
Attestation: command processed on issue #10