Skip to content

Define AF OSS tiers (naming and definitions) #10

Open

Description

@michaeloboyle

Purpose

Name and define the AF OSS adoption tiers, plus the criteria for placement and promotion between them. This anchors how every intake decision categorizes a project.

Current working model (2026-04-23 Tier Model)

Tier Working name Definition Examples
1 Foundation-Owned Repo under agenticsorg; Foundation controls merge, CI, CLA community-projects, OIA-Model
2 Foundation-Endorsed Repo stays with author; Foundation certifies CI, CLA, review SLA ruflo, RuVector, RuView
3 Community-Associated Listed in ecosystem, no guarantees (default state) nagual-qe, agentic-qe, Video Sync, Summary Bot

Open naming question

Proposed simplification: Owned / Endorsed / Affiliated (vs the current Foundation-Owned / Foundation-Endorsed / Community-Associated).

Also pending: a "rings of adoption" framing to remove the status-hierarchy connotation. Concentric model: inner ring (Owned) is AF at the center, outer ring (Affiliated) is AF-blessed but independent.

To decide

  • Tier names: Owned / Endorsed / Affiliated, vs current names, vs rings-of-adoption framing.
  • Precise definition of each tier.
  • Placement criteria: how a project lands in a tier (default to repo location: agenticsorg implies Owned; author namespace implies Endorsed or Affiliated).
  • Promotion criteria: Affiliated to Endorsed adds CI + CLA + review SLA; Endorsed to Owned transfers the repo to agenticsorg.

References

  • 2026-04-23 Tier Model Diagram.
  • Scope boundary: five containers (2026-05-13).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions