FINERACT-2751: Implement interoperation transfer query

[shubhamchaudhary29]

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2751

Problem

GET /interoperation/transactions/{transactionCode}/transfers/{transferCode} previously returned no result because an Interoperation transfer did not retain a durable association to its transaction code.

Change

Adds a small tenant-scoped interop_transfer lookup record containing only the transaction code, transfer code, action state, and latest completion timestamp. Successful PREPARE, CREATE/COMMIT, and RELEASE actions create or update that exact pair in their existing transaction. The GET endpoint performs an exact-pair lookup and returns 404 for an unknown or mismatched pair.

The endpoint permission is corrected from READ_INTERQUOTE to READ_INTERTRANSFER.

Migration and compatibility

The additive Liquibase migration creates a composite unique constraint on (transaction_code, transfer_code). Existing transfer behavior and the response route/schema are preserved. Legacy transfers cannot be backfilled reliably because their transaction-code association was never durably stored; therefore, they return 404.

Tests and checks

• Added Interoperation integration coverage for prepared and committed transfer lookup, response fields/completed timestamp, unknown pairs, and both mismatch directions.
• :fineract-provider:compileJava completed during focused compilation.
• git diff --check passed.

The full Interoperation integration test and complete quality matrix have not completed locally in this environment; GitHub CI will be monitored and any branch-caused failure will be fixed.

Scope exclusions

No PaymentDetail or m_payment_detail changes, quote/transaction-request persistence, audit-command queries, broad refactoring, dependencies, CI workflow changes, or historical backfill are included.

[shubhamchaudhary29]

Hi maintainers, the workflows for this PR are currently blocked with action_required,
and no CI jobs have executed. Could someone with write access please approve and run the workflows? I’ll address any branch-caused failures once CI runs. Thank you.

[shubhamchaudhary29]

@adamsaghy can you please approve the workflows, i did some changes for the conflicts.
wanted to check if any ci faliures left.

[shubhamchaudhary29]

hi @adamsaghy , all the CI faliures happened because of the added PRs (thats what i think), but i think it should work out. please approve the workflow

[shubhamchaudhary29]

hi @adamsaghy, can you please review this pr. thanks