Skip to content

GROOVY-11516: Improve consistency of treatment for internal properties#2118

Closed
paulk-asert wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
paulk-asert:groovy11516
Closed

GROOVY-11516: Improve consistency of treatment for internal properties#2118
paulk-asert wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
paulk-asert:groovy11516

Conversation

@paulk-asert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Nov 3, 2024

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.6630%. Comparing base (6cd477b) to head (c6bbbb6).
⚠️ Report is 1451 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##               master      #2118        +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage     68.5957%   68.6630%   +0.0673%     
- Complexity      29233      29411       +178     
==================================================
  Files            1426       1427         +1     
  Lines          113494     113626       +132     
  Branches        19548      19635        +87     
==================================================
+ Hits            77852      78019       +167     
+ Misses          29088      29043        -45     
- Partials         6554       6564        +10     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/main/java/groovy/lang/MetaClassImpl.java 76.8855% <100.0000%> (+0.2991%) ⬆️

... and 105 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@paulk-asert paulk-asert marked this pull request as draft November 6, 2024 10:03
@paulk-asert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Relooking at GROOVY-11928.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants