[SPARK-56318][BUILD][4.0] Upgrade jackson to 2.18.6#55133
Open
manuzhang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.0from
Open
[SPARK-56318][BUILD][4.0] Upgrade jackson to 2.18.6#55133manuzhang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.0from
manuzhang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.0from
Conversation
Fixes vulnerability GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq
manuzhang
force-pushed
the
upgrade-jackson-spark4.0
branch
from
f8d66df to
ecc3ad4
Compare
manuzhang
changed the title
Member
Author
|
@dongjoon-hyun @pan3793 please help review the PR, thanks！ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes vulnerability GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq
Why are the changes needed?
jackson-core 2.18.2 is affected.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.