demonstrate bug with joining across aggregates#671
Merged
zachdaniel merged 1 commit intoash-project:mainfrom Jan 29, 2026
Merged
demonstrate bug with joining across aggregates#671zachdaniel merged 1 commit intoash-project:mainfrom
zachdaniel merged 1 commit intoash-project:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Poking around some of the ash_sql source code, I'm suspicious of these lines: https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/blob/main/lib/join.ex#L959-L997 which seem to use incremented I'm not familiar enough with this code to be confident in that diagnosis or a fix, though. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contributor checklist
Leave anything that you believe does not apply unchecked.
I ran onto this organically while using ash, and it smelled strongly like a bug to me. Managed to repro here. Take a look at this query (generated by this test). I added a comment on the problematic line
Instead of
p1."id" = sc0."post_id", we should get p1."post_id" = sc0."post_id" or something similar.p1."id"is thepost_tagID which is not relevant here.My assumption is that this is an ash_postgres bug, but it could be an ash core bug too, I'm not entirely sure!