Skip to content

Add CGAL to users.adoc - #594

Merged
Becheler merged 1 commit into
boostorg:developfrom
afabri:AddCGALtoUsers
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Add CGAL to users.adoc#594
Becheler merged 1 commit into
boostorg:developfrom
afabri:AddCGALtoUsers

Conversation

@afabri

@afabri afabri commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting

  • This PR targets the develop branch.
  • I searched for an existing PR or issue covering the same change.
  • My contribution is licensed under the Boost Software License 1.0.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature or API addition
  • Refactor (no behavior change)
  • Documentation
  • Build, CI, or tooling
  • Other (specify below)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes (describe migration impact below)
  • No

What this PR does

This PR adds a link to the chapter of the documentation of the CGAL Library to the list of projects using the BGL

Motivation

First, CGAL provides models to the boost concept Graph. This enables to run any BGL algorithm directly on a triangle mesh.
Second, inspired by the design of the BGL, we add the concept FaceGraph which has a face_descriptor. As meshes have an embedding, we exploit that edges are sorted around vertices.

Testing

I only added a URL

Checklist

  • Existing tests pass (b2 in the test/ directory).
  • New behavior is covered by a test, or this is a docs / build / refactor change.
  • Documentation was updated if user-facing behavior changed.
  • No new compiler warnings on the platforms I built against.

@afabri
afabri requested a review from Becheler as a code owner September 8, 2026 06:59
@cppalliance-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://594.graph.prtest3.cppalliance.org/libs/graph/doc/html/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2026-09-08 07:07:04 UTC

@afabri

afabri commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

If the maintainers were interested, we can also provide a page similar to the page concerning LEDA. Although, I must say that I do not like the word "conversion", but prefer "adaption", as conversion sounds like creating a new representation.

@Becheler

Becheler commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @afabri ! Good to hear from you !
I hope you're well ! We would be happy to see a page similar to LEDA or Stanford Graphs !
If you don't like the word conversion, maybe the Stanford page rewrite is a bit more clear.
Let us know if you need help in any way 😄

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Boost dependency footprint vs develop (auto-generated).
PR run 34197171894 vs develop run 34059816381 (05e34114d4).

Header-inclusion weights (graph files pulling each direct dependency in):

No header-inclusion-weight changes.

Transitive Boost modules: 47 → 47 (0)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Compiler-warning counts vs develop (auto-generated).
PR run 34197171767 vs develop run 34059816363 (05e34114d4).

Job Baseline After Delta
macos (clang, 14) 444 444 0
macos (clang, 17) 407 407 0
macos (clang, 20) 407 407 0
ubuntu (clang-19, 14) 444 444 0
ubuntu (clang-19, 17) 407 407 0
ubuntu (clang-19, 20) 407 407 0
ubuntu (clang-19, 23) 407 407 0
ubuntu (gcc-14, 14) 373 373 0
ubuntu (gcc-14, 17) 369 369 0
ubuntu (gcc-14, 20) 369 369 0
ubuntu (gcc-14, 23) 369 369 0
windows_msvc_14_3 (msvc-14.3) 961 961 0

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Becheler
Becheler merged commit bb7a1a3 into boostorg:develop Sep 8, 2026
31 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants