Rearchitect ExecutionFrame to be a direct Activation - #1489
Merged
Merged
Conversation
TristonianJones
force-pushed
the
cost-perf-fix
branch
from
September 15, 2026 16:53
0ecdc33 to
73cbeda
Compare
dmitriplotnikov
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The introduction of the
ExecutionFrameresulted in certain inefficiencies asit was merged with existing patterns of
Activationpooling. By shifting to makethe
ExecutionFramethe mainActivation(orActivation-holder), the archgets simpler and the performance improves significantly.
Additionally, a handful of
deferclauses have been removed to avoid the 10ns overheadassociated with their management.