Codex-generated pull request #129

luandro · 2026-02-11T23:39:22Z

Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.

Codex Task

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

This PR implements content repository management infrastructure for the API server, enabling content-mutating jobs (notion:fetch, notion:fetch-all, notion:translate) to commit and push changes to a dedicated git branch.

Key Changes

New content-repo.ts module: Implements git repository lifecycle management with lock-based serialization, cancellation support, and secure credential handling via GIT_ASKPASS
Lock acquisition improvements: Properly distinguishes EEXIST (retry) from other filesystem errors (fail fast), honors shouldAbort callback during lock wait to enable prompt cancellation
Job executor integration: Content-mutating jobs now execute within the content repo workflow with proper path resolution using PROJECT_ROOT constant
Comprehensive test coverage: New content-repo.test.ts validates lock retry, error handling, cancellation, and concurrent initialization scenarios
Docker configuration: Updates workflow to use communityfirst/comapeo-docs-api image name, adds publish mode logic for graceful credential handling
Infrastructure: Adds git to Dockerfile, documents required env vars in .env.example
Error resilience: generateBlocks.ts now catches page processing errors to prevent batch failures

Review Notes

The implementation addresses the P1 and P2 issues documented in PR_129_REVIEW_FINDINGS.md:

✅ Lock retry now only retries on EEXIST, fails fast on other errors
✅ Cancellation is checked during lock acquisition loop via shouldAbort callback
✅ Script path resolution uses explicit PROJECT_ROOT instead of runtime process.cwd()
✅ Test coverage includes lock contention, cancellation, and error scenarios

The code quality is strong with proper separation of concerns, comprehensive error handling, and good test coverage.

Confidence Score: 4/5

This PR is safe to merge with low risk - the implementation properly handles lock contention, cancellation, and error scenarios
Score reflects solid implementation quality with comprehensive test coverage for critical paths (lock acquisition, cancellation, error handling). The main risk areas (git credential handling, concurrent job execution, path resolution) are properly addressed. Confidence is 4/5 rather than 5/5 because this is new infrastructure that introduces git operations and filesystem locking - production validation would provide full confidence
No files require special attention - all critical components have corresponding test coverage

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts	Adds comprehensive git repository management with lock acquisition, cancellation support, and proper error handling for EEXIST vs other errors
scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts	Integrates content repo workflow for mutating jobs, adds PROJECT_ROOT for stable path resolution, properly passes cancellation callbacks
scripts/api-server/content-repo.test.ts	Comprehensive test coverage for lock retry, fast-fail on non-EEXIST errors, cancellation during lock wait, and concurrent initialization
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml	Changes image name to communityfirst/comapeo-docs-api and adds publish mode logic to handle missing credentials gracefully
Dockerfile	Adds git package dependency required for content repository operations
scripts/notion-fetch/generateBlocks.ts	Adds error handling wrapper around processSinglePage to prevent uncaught exceptions from crashing batch processing

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant JobExecutor
    participant ContentRepo
    participant LockMgr as Lock Manager
    participant Git
    participant Remote as GitHub Remote

    Client->>JobExecutor: executeJob(notion:fetch)
    JobExecutor->>JobExecutor: isContentMutatingJob() → true
    JobExecutor->>ContentRepo: runContentTask(taskName, requestId, taskRunner, {shouldAbort})
    
    ContentRepo->>LockMgr: acquireRepoLock(lockPath, shouldAbort)
    
    loop Lock Acquisition
        LockMgr->>LockMgr: assertNotAborted(shouldAbort)
        LockMgr->>LockMgr: open(lockPath, "wx")
        alt Lock Available
            LockMgr-->>ContentRepo: {release: fn}
        else EEXIST (Lock Held)
            LockMgr->>LockMgr: sleep(200ms)
        else Other Error
            LockMgr-->>ContentRepo: throw ContentRepoError
        end
    end
    
    ContentRepo->>ContentRepo: initializeContentRepo()
    ContentRepo->>Git: config user.name/email
    ContentRepo->>Git: remote set-url origin
    
    ContentRepo->>ContentRepo: assertNotAborted()
    ContentRepo->>Git: fetch origin content
    ContentRepo->>Git: checkout -B content origin/content
    ContentRepo->>Git: reset --hard origin/content
    ContentRepo->>Git: clean -fd
    
    ContentRepo->>ContentRepo: assertNotAborted()
    ContentRepo->>JobExecutor: taskRunner(workdir)
    JobExecutor->>JobExecutor: spawn(bun, script, {cwd: workdir})
    JobExecutor-->>ContentRepo: output
    
    ContentRepo->>ContentRepo: assertNotAborted()
    ContentRepo->>Git: status --porcelain
    
    alt Changes Detected
        ContentRepo->>Git: add -A
        ContentRepo->>Git: commit -m "content-bot: ..."
        ContentRepo->>ContentRepo: assertNotAborted()
        ContentRepo->>Git: push origin content
        ContentRepo->>Git: rev-parse HEAD
        Git-->>ContentRepo: commitSha
        ContentRepo-->>JobExecutor: {output, noOp: false, commitSha}
    else No Changes
        ContentRepo-->>JobExecutor: {output, noOp: true}
    end
    
    ContentRepo->>LockMgr: lock.release()
    LockMgr->>LockMgr: close(lockFile)
    LockMgr->>LockMgr: rm(lockPath)
    
    JobExecutor-->>Client: Job completed

github-actions · 2026-02-11T23:42:49Z

🚀 Preview Deployment

Your documentation preview is ready!

Preview URL: https://pr-129.comapeo-docs.pages.dev

🔄 Content: Regenerated 5 pages from Notion (script changes detected)

💡 Tip: Add label fetch-all-pages to test with full content, or fetch-10-pages for broader coverage.

This preview will update automatically when you push new commits to this PR.

_{Built with commit c98437d}

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6d4039f6f9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

scripts/api-server/server.ts

scripts/test-docker/test-fetch.sh

luandro · 2026-02-12T00:29:10Z

@codex @greptile review

greptile-apps

_{6 files reviewed, 1 comment}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

comapeo-docs/scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts

Lines 294 to 297 in 34ad416

    
           // Register the process so it can be killed on cancellation 
        
           jobTracker.registerProcess(jobId, { 
        
             kill: () => childProcess?.kill("SIGTERM"), 
        
           });

Honor cancellation before running content sync steps

For content-mutating jobs, process cancellation is only wired once runJobProcess registers the child process, but that runner is invoked inside runContentTask after lock wait/fetch/reset work; if a user cancels during that pre-spawn window (for example while queued behind another mutating job), cancelJob marks the job failed yet execution can still continue and eventually push content changes. This makes cancellation non-authoritative and can produce commits after an explicit cancel request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts

greptile-apps

_{7 files reviewed, 1 comment}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts

The lock acquisition must happen AFTER directory creation to avoid 30-minute timeout when dirname(WORKDIR) doesn't exist. This regression was introduced when serialization logic was added in commit 13ab1e7. The acquireRepoLock() call would fail with ENOENT and retry as if it were lock contention, rather than immediately failing or succeeding. Fixes the order to: 1. initializeContentRepo() - creates dirname(workdir) with mkdir -p 2. acquireRepoLock() - creates lock file in now-existing directory

greptile-apps

_{7 files reviewed, 4 comments}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts

Replace boolean `initialized` flag with promise-based lock to prevent concurrent initialization race conditions in git config operations. - Use `initPromise` to ensure single initialization across concurrent calls - Reset promise on failure to allow retry after transient errors - Addresses code review feedback on lines 203-259 Reviewed-by: OpenAI Codex

* fix(api-server): address pr review race and path issues * fix(ci): align docker publish workflow with validation and tests * fix(ci): use version tags for docker publish actions * fix(api-server): address pr 133 review regressions * fix(ci-validation): restore docker action pinning policy checks * fix(content-repo): reintroduce safe init singleton * fix(ci): disable docker push when registry secrets are unavailable * test(ci): cover docker publish secret-gating behavior

greptile-apps

_{12 files reviewed, 1 comment}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts

greptile-apps

_{13 files reviewed, 3 comments}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts

)

…po locking (#135) * test(api-server): add focused content-repo lock and init race coverage * docs(api-server): document content-repo envs for docker runtime * feat(test-docker): add docker-compose fetch-all smoke script

socket-security · 2026-02-12T13:39:19Z

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff	Package	Supply Chain Security	Vulnerability	Quality	Maintenance	License
	yaml@2.8.2

View full report

github-actions · 2026-02-12T13:43:13Z

🧹 Preview Deployment Cleanup

The preview deployment for this PR has been cleaned up.

Preview URL was: https://pr-129.comapeo-docs.pages.dev

_{Note: Cloudflare Pages deployments follow automatic retention policies. Old previews are cleaned up automatically.}

* fix(notion-fetch): isolate per-page failures in batch processing * fix(api-server): defer content repo init and relax health readiness * fix(api-server): serialize init and honor pre-spawn cancellation * fix(content-repo): initialize repo before acquiring lock The lock acquisition must happen AFTER directory creation to avoid 30-minute timeout when dirname(WORKDIR) doesn't exist. This regression was introduced when serialization logic was added in commit 13ab1e7. The acquireRepoLock() call would fail with ENOENT and retry as if it were lock contention, rather than immediately failing or succeeding. Fixes the order to: 1. initializeContentRepo() - creates dirname(workdir) with mkdir -p 2. acquireRepoLock() - creates lock file in now-existing directory * fix(content-repo): prevent initialization race condition Replace boolean `initialized` flag with promise-based lock to prevent concurrent initialization race conditions in git config operations. - Use `initPromise` to ensure single initialization across concurrent calls - Reset promise on failure to allow retry after transient errors - Addresses code review feedback on lines 203-259 Reviewed-by: OpenAI Codex * Codex-generated pull request (#133) * fix(api-server): address pr review race and path issues * fix(ci): align docker publish workflow with validation and tests * fix(ci): use version tags for docker publish actions * fix(api-server): address pr 133 review regressions * fix(ci-validation): restore docker action pinning policy checks * fix(content-repo): reintroduce safe init singleton * fix(ci): disable docker push when registry secrets are unavailable * test(ci): cover docker publish secret-gating behavior * doc: review findings * fix(api-server): harden content repo lock and script path handling (#134) * test(api-server): complete PR 129 reliability coverage for content repo locking (#135) * test(api-server): add focused content-repo lock and init race coverage * docs(api-server): document content-repo envs for docker runtime * feat(test-docker): add docker-compose fetch-all smoke script

luandro added the codex label Feb 11, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

chatgpt-codex-connector bot reviewed Feb 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/server.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/test-docker/test-fetch.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

greptile-apps bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

chatgpt-codex-connector bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

greptile-apps bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

luandro and others added 4 commits February 11, 2026 22:03

fix(notion-fetch): isolate per-page failures in batch processing

f2c41cb

fix(api-server): defer content repo init and relax health readiness

13d6a1f

fix(api-server): serialize init and honor pre-spawn cancellation

373fe44

luandro force-pushed the codex/update-docker-api-for-repo-management branch from 3dae2c4 to 75b9cf3 Compare February 12, 2026 01:06

greptile-apps bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

luandro added 2 commits February 11, 2026 22:10

greptile-apps bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts Show resolved Hide resolved

doc: review findings

7895370

greptile-apps bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/api-server/content-repo.ts Show resolved Hide resolved

scripts/api-server/job-executor.ts Show resolved Hide resolved

luandro mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2026

fix(api-server): harden content-repo lock & resolve scripts from project root #134

Merged

fix(api-server): harden content repo lock and script path handling (#134

52547c9

)

This was referenced Feb 12, 2026

test(api-server): complete PR 129 reliability coverage for content repo locking #135

Merged

api-driven notion operations #126

Open

luandro merged commit 2eb8bee into feat/notion-api-service Feb 12, 2026
5 checks passed

luandro deleted the codex/update-docker-api-for-repo-management branch February 12, 2026 13:43

	// Register the process so it can be killed on cancellation
	jobTracker.registerProcess(jobId, {
	kill: () => childProcess?.kill("SIGTERM"),
	});

Codex-generated pull request #129

Codex-generated pull request #129

Uh oh!

Conversation

luandro commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited by greptile-apps bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

Key Changes

Review Notes

Confidence Score: 4/5

Important Files Changed

Sequence Diagram

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🚀 Preview Deployment

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

luandro commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

socket-security bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2026

🧹 Preview Deployment Cleanup

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

luandro commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited by greptile-apps bot

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading