Skip to content

Conversation

@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor

@szabosteve szabosteve commented Dec 5, 2025

Summary

Related to #4225

This PR adds the jina-reranker-v2 model availability info and example to the Jina models page.

TO DO

  • Performance considerations

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No

@szabosteve szabosteve added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request inference Team:Developer Issues owned by the Developer Docs Team v9.3.0 labels Dec 5, 2025
@szabosteve szabosteve changed the title Szabosteve/jina reranker v2 docs [E&A] Add docs for jina-reranker-v2 Dec 5, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@szabosteve szabosteve marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 16:31
@szabosteve szabosteve requested review from a team as code owners December 10, 2025 16:31
@seanhandley
Copy link
Contributor

@elastic/developer-docs @elastic/experience-docs Could I get a +1 on this? We'll need to merge it in the next couple of weeks when reranker tech preview is enabled - it would be great to be able to push the button when the time comes cc @leemthompo

Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - I directly pushed a few fixes as @szabosteve is out. Feel free to merge whenever needed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request inference Team:Developer Issues owned by the Developer Docs Team v9.3.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants