Skip to content

checklocks: enforce lisafs bookkeeping - #14308

Closed
tamird wants to merge 1 commit into
google:masterfrom
tamird:checklocks-lisafs-state
Closed

checklocks: enforce lisafs bookkeeping#14308
tamird wants to merge 1 commit into
google:masterfrom
tamird:checklocks-lisafs-state

Conversation

@tamird

@tamird tamird commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Enforce existing mutex contracts for channel collections, descriptor tracking, and per-node and per-control-FD descriptor lists. Require the connection lock when removing a tracked descriptor; callers still drop the returned reference.

Declare atomic access to deletion flags, since recursive deletion marks descendants without their operation locks. Require the rename read lock when removing an unpublished control FD, retaining its lifetime condition and the conditional parent-lock requirement during node initialization.

Assisted-by: Codex

Enforce existing mutex contracts for channel collections, descriptor
tracking, and per-node and per-control-FD descriptor lists. Require the
connection lock when removing a tracked descriptor; callers still drop
the returned reference.

Declare atomic access to deletion flags, since recursive deletion marks
descendants without their operation locks. Require the rename read lock
when removing an unpublished control FD, retaining its lifetime
condition and the conditional parent-lock requirement during node
initialization.

Assisted-by: Codex
@tamird

tamird commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

r? @milantracy Could you review LISAFS descriptor bookkeeping, rename locking, and deletion atomics?

Focused local Bazel checks passed. Upstream checks have not reported yet.

Assisted-by: Codex

@tamird

tamird commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of consolidated #14343. The expanded replacement commits are prepared locally; the replacement branch has not been pushed yet.

Assisted-by: Codex

@tamird tamird closed this Aug 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant