Add ATOMIC attribute #76

Activity

1. moon-chilled commented on Apr 16, 2022

   

   moon-chilled

   on Apr 16, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   does this need a new attribute? should just need u rank<=v rank

   reblock very large arguments for best use of caches

   ideal solution to this is a compiler, to fuse everything. Obvious difficulties
2. HenryHRich commented on Apr 16, 2022

   

   HenryHRich

   on Apr 16, 2022 via email

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   It needs a minimum-rank attribute for a verb, to make sure the system doesn't subdivide a unit.

   …

   On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, 3:23 AM moon-chilled ***@***.***> wrote: does this need a new attribute? should just need u rank<=v rank reblock very large arguments for best use of caches ideal solution to this is a compiler, to fuse everything. Obvious difficulties — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#76 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEKVAJ32KHWVTGVBPMQVIQDVFJTH7ANCNFSM5EPUIEAA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
3. HenryHRich

   added

   enhancement

   discuss

   on Mar 29, 2026
4. HenryHRich commented on Mar 29, 2026

   

   HenryHRich

   on Mar 29, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   atomic@atomic now gives a warning; breaking rank loops is an ongoing project
5. jsoftware

   locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Mar 29, 2026
6. HenryHRich

   converted this issue into a discussion #251 on Mar 29, 2026