Skip to content

chore: remove Codemod from partners list - #9084

Merged
avivkeller merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-codemod-partner
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

chore: remove Codemod from partners list#9084
avivkeller merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-codemod-partner

Conversation

@mcollina

@mcollina mcollina commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After a brief check with @rginn, I can confirm there is no signed agreement for including the Codemod logo in our website. This is true for all other vendors listed.

Therefore, I'm removing it.

@mcollina
mcollina requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2026 16:26
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 5, 2026 16:26
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org Ready Ready Preview Aug 5, 2026 4:26pm

Request Review

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Static marketing data only; no runtime, auth, or data-handling impact.

Overview
Removes the Codemod partner entry from apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json so the site no longer shows their logo/link among official partners.

This aligns the public partners list with confirmed agreements (Codemod had no signed agreement for logo use on the site).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b76e739. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes the Codemod vendor entry from the site’s static partners list, aligning the website’s displayed partner logos with the stated requirement that vendors must have a signed agreement.

Changes:

  • Removed the CODEMOD partner object from apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.07%. Comparing base (c06cfed) to head (b76e739).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9084   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.07%   75.07%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines        9118     9111    -7     
  Branches      377      377           
=======================================
- Hits         6845     6840    -5     
+ Misses       2269     2267    -2     
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Build Size Comparison

Summary

Metric Value
Old Total First Load JS 7.16 MB
New Total First Load JS 7.16 MB
Delta 0 B (0.00%)

@AugustinMauroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ovflowd ovflowd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How was this added then back then? Did someone verify they had an agreement with us?

@AugustinMauroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think we added after https://openjsf.org/blog/codemod-openjs-foundation-partner but we didn't verify that part

@mcollina

mcollina commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

could you also include https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/tree/main/packages/ui-components/src/Icons/PartnerLogos/Codemod in the removal

we have a lot of other logos that are not in use

@bmuenzenmeyer

bmuenzenmeyer commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

How was this added then back then? Did someone verify they had an agreement with us?

#8266

retrospect (blameless), we should have attained @nodejs/marketing before merge - we have gotten a lot better about that of late (IMO)

@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merging as a foundation request

@avivkeller
avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 5, 2026
@mcollina

mcollina commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Can we land this and then do the cleanup in a followup?

Merged via the queue into main with commit c944548 Aug 5, 2026
17 checks passed
@avivkeller
avivkeller deleted the remove-codemod-partner branch August 5, 2026 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants