Skip to content

Conversation

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

  • Clone openshift/velero (oadp-dev branch) in ci-Dockerfile for source code
    investigation during failure analysis
  • Add Velero source code investigation prompts to analyze_failures.sh,
    enabling Claude to trace errors back to Velero implementation
  • Add must-gather improvement suggestions section to analysis output,
    creating a feedback loop for improving diagnostics collection
  • Add data mover volume restore limitation to error ignore patterns
    (claim Selector not supported per failed to restore volume with StorageClass, claim Selector is not supported vmware-tanzu/velero#7946)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 [email protected]

Why the changes were made

How to test the changes made

…edback

- Clone openshift/velero (oadp-dev branch) in ci-Dockerfile for source code
  investigation during failure analysis
- Add Velero source code investigation prompts to analyze_failures.sh,
  enabling Claude to trace errors back to Velero implementation
- Add must-gather improvement suggestions section to analysis output,
  creating a feedback loop for improving diagnostics collection
- Add data mover volume restore limitation to error ignore patterns
  (claim Selector not supported per vmware-tanzu/velero#7946)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 18, 2025 16:19
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Adds a Velero repo checkout to the CI Dockerfile, extends an E2E error-ignore pattern for a Data Mover restore message, and enriches the failure-analysis script with Velero/OADP source-code references and step-by-step investigation guidance.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI/Build Infrastructure
build/ci-Dockerfile
Inserts a git clone of github.com/openshift/velero (branch oadp-dev, depth 1) into /go/src/github.com/openshift/velero prior to running go mod download.
Test Failure Patterns
tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go
Adds an error-ignore pattern: "failed to restore volume with StorageClass, claim Selector is not supported".
Failure Analysis Script
tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh
Adds Velero and OADP source-code references, a "Velero Source Code Investigation" section, expanded analysis prompts (including Claude preprocessing), updated artifact listings, and must-gather improvement suggestions—documentation and guidance only.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Review focus areas:
    • build/ci-Dockerfile: verify clone step ordering, network/security implications, and path correctness.
    • tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh: confirm prompts and references are accurate and do not alter runtime behavior.
    • tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go: ensure the added ignore pattern is precise and intended.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 226dc5f and 5a8aaca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh (5)

242-270: Excellent addition for source-based failure analysis.

This section provides comprehensive guidance for investigating error origins in source code. The step-by-step workflow and detailed package listings will help Claude effectively trace errors back to their implementation, improving root cause analysis quality.


380-400: Great addition for diagnostic improvement feedback loop.

This section creates a valuable feedback mechanism for must-gather evolution. By explicitly prompting Claude to identify missing diagnostic data, you enable continuous improvement of the data collection process. The structured format with examples makes the feedback actionable.


412-414: LGTM!

This guidance reinforces the must-gather feedback loop introduced earlier, ensuring Claude explicitly notes when missing information hampers analysis. This consistency strengthens the diagnostic improvement mechanism.


455-465: LGTM!

The source code investigation instructions are well-integrated into the Claude invocation prompt. They provide clear guidance on using source code to understand error conditions, retry logic, and edge cases. This complements the earlier "Source Code Investigation" section and leverages the --add-dir "/go/src" access granted on line 436.


220-227: No documentation change needed—paths are CI infrastructure.

Lines 220-227 reference /go/src/github.com/openshift/velero/ and /go/src/github.com/openshift/oadp-operator/, which are guaranteed to exist in the CI environment. The ci-Dockerfile explicitly clones Velero to the first path (using the oadp-dev branch) and sets up the OADP operator in the second. These are container build-time dependencies, not runtime dependencies that require verification or documentation within the script. The paths are already documented in the Claude prompt itself (lines 220-227 provide detailed descriptions for Claude's analysis), and the script correctly passes --add-dir "/go/src" to grant Claude access to both directories.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kaovilai

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR enhances the Claude-based failure analysis system by integrating Velero source code access and adding a feedback mechanism for must-gather improvements. The changes enable deeper root cause analysis by allowing Claude to investigate Velero implementation details when analyzing test failures, and create a feedback loop for improving diagnostic data collection.

Key Changes:

  • Added Velero source code cloning in the CI Docker image for runtime investigation during failure analysis
  • Extended failure analysis prompts to guide Claude through Velero source code investigation when errors originate from Velero packages
  • Added must-gather improvement suggestions section to capture gaps in diagnostic data collection

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
build/ci-Dockerfile Clones openshift/velero (oadp-dev branch) to provide source code access for failure analysis
tests/e2e/scripts/analyze_failures.sh Adds Velero source investigation prompts and must-gather feedback section to guide Claude's analysis workflow
tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go Adds known data mover limitation to error ignore patterns based on upstream Velero issue

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

5. **Correlation**: Group related errors together - if multiple errors reference the same resource (backup name, PVC, pod), keep them together with their context.
6. **Source references**: When you find errors from Velero packages (pkg/backup/, pkg/restore/, pkg/controller/, pkg/nodeagent/), note the file:line references for later source code investigation.
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing space after 'pkg/nodeagent/' before the closing parenthesis for consistency with other package references.

Suggested change
6. **Source references**: When you find errors from Velero packages (pkg/backup/, pkg/restore/, pkg/controller/, pkg/nodeagent/), note the file:line references for later source code investigation.
6. **Source references**: When you find errors from Velero packages (pkg/backup/, pkg/restore/, pkg/controller/, pkg/nodeagent/ ), note the file:line references for later source code investigation.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Note: Prow's build-log.txt is NOT available during this analysis (it's written after tests complete).
Focus on JUnit results, preprocessed log summaries, must-gather diagnostics, and per-test pod logs.
Focus on JUnit results, preprocessed log summaries, must-gather diagnostics, per-test pod logs, and Velero source investigation.
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The line references 'Velero source investigation' but this capability depends on the Docker image containing the cloned source code. Consider adding a note about this dependency or verifying the source code is available before attempting investigation.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

# Clone openshift/velero source code for failure analysis
# Uses oadp-dev branch to match OADP operator development
RUN git clone --depth 1 --branch oadp-dev \
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The --depth 1 shallow clone limits git history to one commit. If failure analysis requires examining recent changes or commit history for context, this might be insufficient. Consider if a deeper history (e.g., --depth 50) would be more useful for analysis purposes, or document this limitation if intentional.

Suggested change
RUN git clone --depth 1 --branch oadp-dev \
RUN git clone --depth 50 --branch oadp-dev \

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Enable Claude to investigate OADP operator source at
/go/src/github.com/openshift/oadp-operator/ during failure analysis:

- Add OADP operator source to Available Artifacts section
- Rename "Velero Source Code Investigation" to "Source Code Investigation"
  with subsections for both Velero and OADP packages
- Update Claude invocation prompt to reference OADP source
- List key OADP packages: internal/controller/, pkg/velero/,
  pkg/credentials/, api/v1alpha1/, tests/e2e/lib/

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@kaovilai: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/4.20-e2e-test-cli-aws 5a8aaca link false /test 4.20-e2e-test-cli-aws
ci/prow/4.20-e2e-test-aws 5a8aaca link true /test 4.20-e2e-test-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant