OSDOCS-18784-3 added ESO assembly and modules#111755
Open
wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
size/L
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-18784-3
branch
from
e67738f to
9a1971d
Compare
|
🤖 Fri May 15 18:11:56 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
|
|
||
| These release notes track the development of {external-secrets-operator-short}. | ||
|
|
||
| For more information, see xref:../../security/external_secrets_operator/index.adoc#external-secrets-operator-about[{external-secrets-operator-short} overview]. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.ConceptLink: Move all links and cross references to Additional resources.
|
|
||
| These release notes track the development of {external-secrets-operator-short}. | ||
|
|
||
| For more information, see xref:../../security/external_secrets_operator/index.adoc#external-secrets-operator-about[{external-secrets-operator-short} overview]. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] Vale.Terms: Use 'Operators?' instead of 'operator'.
wgabor0427
force-pushed
the
OSDOCS-18784-3
branch
from
9a1971d to
472f342
Compare
| :_mod-docs-content-type: ASSEMBLY | ||
| [id="external-secrets-operator-release-notes"] | ||
| include::_attributes/common-attributes.adoc[] | ||
| :context: external-secrets-operator-release-notes |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] Vale.Terms: Use 'Operators?' instead of 'operator'.
|
@wgabor0427: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version(s):
4.18
Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-18784
Link to docs preview:
https://111755--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/security/external_secrets_operator/external-secrets-operator-release-notes.html
QE review:
Additional information: