Skip to content

OCPBUGS-77281: Fix exception for multiarch GCE CSI driver image#76171

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jsafrane:add-exception-for-gce
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-77281: Fix exception for multiarch GCE CSI driver image#76171
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
jsafrane:add-exception-for-gce

Conversation

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane jsafrane commented Mar 12, 2026

Using a stable part of the image name. The full name is e2e-42-registry-k8s-io-cloud-provider-gcp-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-v1-4-0-mUHHjVVuv0UQiTyf, where e2e-42, v1-4-0 and the hash at the end often changes in Kubernetes.

openshift-tests images --verify-manifest-lists --allow-missing-architectures=xyz matches xyz as a substring of the image name.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 12, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

GCE does not support ppc64le nor s390x, so they don't publish driver images for these platforms.
We get this image transitively via Kubernetes that runs the driver to test GCE integrations. We don't run these e2e tests in OCP.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from p0lyn0mial and sjenning March 12, 2026 12:47
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/pj-rehearse

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel.

@jsafrane jsafrane force-pushed the add-exception-for-gce branch from a8a458f to 6282d06 Compare March 12, 2026 14:07
Using a stable part of the image name. The full name is
`e2e-42-registry-k8s-io-cloud-provider-gcp-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-v1-4-0-mUHHjVVuv0UQiTyf`,
where `e2e-42`, `v1-4-0` and the hash at the end often changes in
Kubernetes.

`openshift-tests images --verify-manifest-lists
--allow-missing-architectures=xyz` matches `xyz` as a substring of the
image name.
@jsafrane jsafrane force-pushed the add-exception-for-gce branch from 6282d06 to 262dff0 Compare March 12, 2026 14:13
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Using a stable part of the image name. The full name is
e2e-42-registry-k8s-io-cloud-provider-gcp-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-v1-4-0-mUHHjVVuv0UQiTyf,
where e2e-42, v1-4-0 and the hash at the end often changes in
Kubernetes.

openshift-tests images --verify-manifest-lists --allow-missing-architectures=xyz matches xyz as a substring of the
image name.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jsafrane jsafrane changed the title OCPBUGS-77281: Add exception for multiarch GCE CSI driver image OCPBUGS-77281: Fix exception for multiarch GCE CSI driver image Mar 12, 2026
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/pj-rehearse

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@jsafrane: the pj-rehearse plugin accommodates running rehearsal tests for the changes in this PR. Expand 'Interacting with pj-rehearse' for usage details. The following rehearsable tests have been affected by this change:

Test name Repo Type Reason
pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-5.0-verify-image-manifest-lists openshift/origin presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.23-verify-image-manifest-lists openshift/origin presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-origin-release-4.22-verify-image-manifest-lists openshift/origin presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-verify-image-manifest-lists openshift/origin presubmit Ci-operator config changed
Interacting with pj-rehearse

Comment: /pj-rehearse to run up to 5 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse skip to opt-out of rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse {test-name}, with each test separated by a space, to run one or more specific rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse more to run up to 10 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse max to run up to 25 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse auto-ack to run up to 5 rehearsals, and add the rehearsals-ack label on success
Comment: /pj-rehearse list to get an up-to-date list of affected jobs
Comment: /pj-rehearse abort to abort all active rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse network-access-allowed to allow rehearsals of tests that have the restrict_network_access field set to false. This must be executed by an openshift org member who is not the PR author

Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: /pj-rehearse ack to unblock merge. When the rehearsals-ack label is present on your PR, merge will no longer be blocked by rehearsals.
If you would like the rehearsals-ack label removed, comment: /pj-rehearse reject to re-block merging.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 12, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Member

@smg247 smg247 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 12, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane, smg247

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 12, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2026

@jsafrane: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/pj-rehearse ack

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the rehearsals-ack Signifies that rehearsal jobs have been acknowledged label Mar 12, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2d164cb into openshift:main Mar 12, 2026
17 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77281 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Using a stable part of the image name. The full name is e2e-42-registry-k8s-io-cloud-provider-gcp-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-v1-4-0-mUHHjVVuv0UQiTyf, where e2e-42, v1-4-0 and the hash at the end often changes in Kubernetes.

openshift-tests images --verify-manifest-lists --allow-missing-architectures=xyz matches xyz as a substring of the image name.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

qiliRedHat pushed a commit to qiliRedHat/release that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2026
Using a stable part of the image name. The full name is
`e2e-42-registry-k8s-io-cloud-provider-gcp-gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver-v1-4-0-mUHHjVVuv0UQiTyf`,
where `e2e-42`, `v1-4-0` and the hash at the end often changes in
Kubernetes.

`openshift-tests images --verify-manifest-lists
--allow-missing-architectures=xyz` matches `xyz` as a substring of the
image name.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. rehearsals-ack Signifies that rehearsal jobs have been acknowledged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants