refactor: Bump @aws-sdk/s3-request-presigner from 3.1032.0 to 3.1091.0

[mtrezza]

Closes #582

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the AWS S3 request-presigning component to a newer version.
  • Refreshed related package metadata and removed obsolete package entries.

[parse-github-assistant]

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

• Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
• Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
• Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
• We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
• Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
• Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a77ad4e6-a38b-45aa-9e8b-a50182c4bbf7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32abaf4 and c35e15c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package-lock.json
• package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request upgrades @aws-sdk/s3-request-presigner from 3.1032.0 to 3.1091.0 in the package manifest and lockfile. It refreshes dependency metadata and removes obsolete transitive entries.

Changes

S3 presigner dependency update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update dependency declaration and lockfile package.json, package-lock.json	The project now uses @aws-sdk/s3-request-presigner version 3.1091.0. The lockfile updates its metadata and removes obsolete AWS SDK and Smithy package entries.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• parse-community/parse-server-s3-adapter#580: Updates a different AWS SDK dependency to the same target version and refreshes the lockfile graph.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7

✅ Passed checks (7 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title uses the required refactor: prefix and clearly describes the dependency update.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The changes implement issue #582 by updating the dependency and lockfile without functional code changes.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The changes are limited to the requested dependency and lockfile updates.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check	✅ Passed	The diff only updates AWS package metadata and removes obsolete transitive entries; base and head npm audits both report 31 unchanged advisories, with no AWS or Smithy advisories.
Engage In Review Feedback	✅ Passed	PR #586 shows “No reviews” and zero review threads; only the author description and automated bot reports appear, so no review feedback was ignored or resolved.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

package.json

ESLint skipped: missing config or dependency (missing-dependency). The ESLint configuration references a package that is not available in the sandbox.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.77%. Comparing base (32abaf4) to head (c35e15c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #586   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.77%   97.77%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         225      225           
=======================================
  Hits          220      220           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.