Skip to content

Done Tree-2#1597

Open
RitikaC1 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master
Open

Done Tree-2#1597
RitikaC1 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master

Conversation

@RitikaC1

@RitikaC1 RitikaC1 commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Construct Binary Tree from Inorder and Postorder Traversal (Problem1.py)

Strengths:

  • Clean and readable implementation of the recursive algorithm
  • Good use of hash map for O(1) index lookups
  • Correct order of processing (right subtree first, then left subtree)
  • Well-commented with time and space complexity analysis
  • Proper handling of base case (start > end)

Areas for Improvement:

  • The TreeNode class is commented out but not included. While this might be intentional (assuming it's imported), including it would make the code self-contained
  • Could add type hints for better code documentation
  • The variable name index as an instance variable is fine, but could be more descriptive

The solution is functionally equivalent to the reference solution and demonstrates a solid understanding of the problem.

VERDICT: PASS


Sum Root to Leaf Numbers (Problem2.py)

## EVALUATION

### 1. Correctness
The student's solution correctly solves the problem. It uses a recursive helper function that:
- Accumulates the current number by multiplying by 10 and adding the current node's value
- Returns the accumulated value when reaching a leaf node
- Sums up the results from left and right subtrees

The logic is sound and produces the correct output for the given examples.

### 2. Time Complexity
Both the reference solution and the student's solution have **O(n)** time complexity, where n is the number of nodes in the tree. Both solutions visit each node exactly once.

### 3. Space Complexity
Both solutions have **O(h)** space complexity, where h is the height of the tree, due to the recursive call stack. The student's solution is comparable to the reference.

### 4. Code Quality
The student's code is well-structured and readable:
- Clear comments explaining the approach
- Good variable naming (current, left, right)
- Proper base case handling
- Clean recursive structure

The commented-out lines (`#fullAns=0` and `#finalAns=left+right`) are unnecessary and could be removed for cleaner code, but they don't affect functionality.

### 5. Efficiency
The solution is efficient and follows the optimal approach for this problem. No significant optimizations are needed.

## FEEDBACK

**Strengths:**
- Correct recursive approach that properly accumulates numbers along paths
- Clean and readable code structure
- Good base case handling for null nodes
- Proper handling of leaf nodes to return accumulated values
- Well-documented with time and space complexity comments

**Areas for Improvement:**
- Remove commented-out code lines for cleaner production-ready code
- Consider adding docstring documentation for the helper function to explain its purpose and parameters

## 

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants