Fix menu width operator-precedence bug and remove invalid Tailwind z-100 class #667
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes two bugs in apps/web/components/menu.tsx:
const menuWidth = expandedView || isCollapsing ? 600 : isHovered ? 160 : 56relied on implicit precedence and could evaluate unexpectedly.const menuWidth = (expandedView || isCollapsing) ? 600 : (isHovered ? 160 : 56)z-100and use the existing arbitrary z-index variablez-100class which is not part of default Tailwind utilities (and will have no effect unless added to config).z-100from the trigger wrapper and rely on themobileZIndexvalue that uses arbitrary values (z-[70]/z-[100]). This ensures the trigger gets the intended z-index without requiring custom Tailwind config.Files changed
Why
z-100avoids relying on non-standard Tailwind classes and reduces surprising styling bugs on mobile (trigger might be hidden behind other elements).