Skip to content

Conversation

@joseph-isaacs
Copy link
Contributor

@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs commented Jan 20, 2026

Support into_parts for more array using a custom parts struct

@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs requested a review from gatesn January 20, 2026 13:32
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs enabled auto-merge (squash) January 20, 2026 13:32
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs added the chore Release label indicating a trivial change label Jan 20, 2026
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by 13.81%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 1252 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1254 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation bench_many_nulls[0.5] 365 µs 329.5 µs +10.76%
Simulation bench_many_nulls[0.9] 533 µs 468.3 µs +13.81%

Comparing ji/cleanup-duckdb-exporter-execute (993a392) with develop (cd9048d)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1254 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <[email protected]>
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs merged commit 5b5a4af into develop Jan 20, 2026
45 of 46 checks passed
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs deleted the ji/cleanup-duckdb-exporter-execute branch January 20, 2026 15:36
#[inline(always)]
fn vortex_expect(self, msg: &'static str) -> Self::Output {
self.map_err(|err| err.into())
.inspect_err(|e| println!("got a big ERROR {e}"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this intentional?


let conn = database
.connect()
.inspect_err(|e| println!("err {e}"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

or this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

chore Release label indicating a trivial change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants