Skip to content

chore(missing_docs): bookkeeping for the 2026-09-09 exhaustive audit - #717

Merged
hongyi-chen merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
missing-docs/bookkeeping-20260909
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

chore(missing_docs): bookkeeping for the 2026-09-09 exhaustive audit#717
hongyi-chen merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
missing-docs/bookkeeping-20260909

Conversation

@hongyi-chen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Bookkeeping for the exhaustive missing_docs drift-watch run on 2026-09-09. Every candidate was gated out, so this is the only PR from the run — no feature PRs accompany it.

Titled by audit date rather than release version because the release gate was a no-op: check_new_release.py exited 10, current stable is still v0.2026.09.02.08.27.stable_01, and the previous bookkeeping PR (#695) already carries that version. last_release_processed.json is deliberately unchanged.

What ran

Both audit modes exited 0, with no audits_skipped and an empty unaccounted accounting bucket across all 296 feature flags, 91 CLI commands, 209 API routes, 65 slash commands, and 231 settings.

  • Coverage audit - audit_docs.py --warp ../warp --warp-server ../warp-server
  • Snapshot diff - the same, plus --diff
  • Weak coverage - --weak-coverage, for exhaustiveness
  • Surface-scoped slash check - a manual pass over all 65 name: entries in static_commands/commands.rs, working around the audit's documented repo-wide slash blind spot
  • Build - npm ci && npm run build, clean (382 Markdown docs, 384 HTML files)

Re-running the audit after these changes clears every category except the 24 terminology-only staleness hits, which are recorded as no.

Verdicts recorded

Full reasoning and evidence are in changelog_decisions.md; this is the summary.

  • RestorePromptOnInlineModelSelectorSearch (dogfood → GA) - No docs. Opening the inline model selector from the model chip parks input text so the input can filter the model list, then restores it on close (app/src/terminal/input.rs:5666). No setting, CLI flag, or API field; the model chip and /model already surface the selector. Disqualified as a pure UI affordance. Mapped ignore.
  • PeriodicHandoffCheckpoints (dogfood → preview) - Deferred on Gate 0. Periodic workspace-snapshot uploads during a cloud agent run (PREVIEW_FLAGS, crates/warp_features/src/lib.rs:970). Preview, not GA. Re-check on promotion, at which point it belongs on platform/handoff/.
  • POST /factory-inbox/notifications/dismiss and /restore - Deferred on Gate 0. Bulk dismiss and restore for the personal factory inbox (factory_inbox.go:26-27). Mapped -> internal.
  • POST /factory/{uid}/integrations/jira/handoff - Deferred on Gate 0, the Jira counterpart of the Linear handoff route deferred on 2026-09-02. Mapped -> internal. Not a content gap either: the user-facing flow is already covered at factories/integrations/jira.mdx.
  • POST /factory-inbox/notifications/{uid}/dismiss (removed) - Map hygiene. Replaced by the bulk route above; never in the released spec or any page. Dead entry replaced in place.
  • 24 potentially_stale_docs - No docs. Re-verified line by line rather than carried forward from the previous run. All are terminology matches: the known ai credits bucket-name false positive, warp terminal used in the distinguishing sense the style guide permits, a historical FAQ heading, and two live feature names (Generate, AI Command Search). The one genuine wording nit is style_lint territory per SKILL.md.
  • 81 --weak-coverage findings - No docs. Same mapped-page keyword misses verified since 2026-08-26.

Five categories returned zero and are recorded as such so a later run can distinguish "checked and empty" from "not checked": CLI commands, slash commands, settings, stale doc references, and unlisted pages.

Deferred findings

Nothing was silently dropped. Four surfaces carry deferred verdicts, all on Gate 0, all with a recorded re-check condition:

  • PeriodicHandoffCheckpoints - re-check when the flag reaches RELEASE_FLAGS or the default feature set.
  • The three /factory* routes - re-check when the Factory REST API is published. developers/agent-api-openapi.yaml still has zero /factory and /factory-inbox paths, and warp-server is private, so none may be hand-documented. Released factory routes would reach docs through sync-openapi-spec, not this skill.

No content design plan

None of the three cases in .agents/references/content-design-plan.md applies: no page is created, no concept is added, and nothing is corrected on a page. This is bookkeeping, which that reference lists under "when a plan can be skipped."

Reviewer

No reviewer requested. suggest_reviewers.py resolved the two warp source files to the team @warpdotdev/oss-maintainers, and teams are never requested. Both warp-server paths — router/handlers/public_api/factory_inbox.go and factories.go — resolved to no owner, the expected outcome the skill documents for /factory handlers, which carry no entry in that repo's ownership file.

Documentation risk

Risk: low
Rationale: Audit bookkeeping only: surface-map entries, the verdict ledger, and the regenerated surface snapshot. No page under src/content/docs/ changes, and no public product claim is added or altered.
Docs override: none

Unverified claims

None. No VERIFY markers in the changed files.

Record this run's docs-worthiness verdicts, update the surface map for the
six surfaces that drifted, and regenerate the surface snapshot.

Every candidate gated out, so no feature PRs accompany this one.

Co-Authored-By: Warp <agent@warp.dev>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
docs Ready Ready Preview Sep 9, 2026 5:33pm UTC

Request Review

@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label Sep 9, 2026
@hongyi-chen hongyi-chen added the warpy-factory Opened by the Warp factory agents label Sep 9, 2026 — with Warp Agent Staging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

This PR was generated with Warp.

Comment @warp-agent on this PR to send it follow-up work.

@warp-for-oss

warp-for-oss Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hongyi-chen

I'm starting a first review of this pull request.

You can view the conversation on Warp.

I completed the review and no human review was requested for this pull request.

Comment /warp-agent-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).

Powered by Oz

@hongyi-chen
hongyi-chen enabled auto-merge (squash) September 9, 2026 17:31

@warp-for-oss warp-for-oss Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overview

This PR records bookkeeping from the 2026-09-09 missing_docs audit by updating the verdict ledger, surface map, and generated snapshot for feature flag and internal API surface changes. The declared low documentation risk matches the diff because no public documentation pages, public product claims, commands, examples, or user-facing docs content are changed.

Concerns

  • No blocking concerns found.
  • No security findings found in the changed audit bookkeeping files.
  • No implementation/spec drift was assessed because spec_context.md reports that no approved or repository spec context exists for this PR.

Verdict

Found: 0 critical, 0 important, 0 suggestions

Approve

Comment /warp-agent-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).

Powered by Oz

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review summary

The independent agent completed its review for this commit.

Findings

  • No blocking findings.

Verdict

Approve

@warp-agent-staging warp-agent-staging Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overview

This PR updates the missing_docs audit ledger, surface map, and generated snapshot for the 2026-09-09 coverage sweep. The submitted mappings and recorded deferrals are internally consistent, and no public documentation surface changed.

Verdict

Checks: build ✅ · audit-script tests ✅ · map audit ✅ · diff-accounting audit ✅ · CI ⏳ (the Agent docs review check is still in progress; all other reported checks pass)
Found: 0 critical, 0 important, 0 suggestions

Approve

Review run

https://platform.staging.warp.dev/bOEZRU0oiK4KrUD6bKONxk/runs/01a0873a-64c6-7d44-b0ea-43aff0907208

@hongyi-chen
hongyi-chen merged commit 3b45be4 into main Sep 9, 2026
12 checks passed
@hongyi-chen
hongyi-chen deleted the missing-docs/bookkeeping-20260909 branch September 9, 2026 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed warpy-factory Opened by the Warp factory agents

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant