-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
fix: Support page_action for Firefox MV3
#2200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
smashedr
wants to merge
5
commits into
wxt-dev:main
Choose a base branch
from
smashedr:fix_page_action
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+52
−17
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0f11d02
fix: page_action on firefox mv3
smashedr 98a64ec
update: manifest.test.ts and flip logic
smashedr 206a47b
Add another test
aklinker1 141c3e2
Implement correct manifest generation logic for one action
aklinker1 2efc0df
My test was flakey... fixed
aklinker1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it then not make sense to add a better alias, say
type? It's pretty confusing to have something calledmv2which then still applies to mv3Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered deprecating this property and creating a new field called
actionType, yes. However, for modules that modify this field, they'll only modify one of the two properties and they'll be out-of-sync... So a simple second field wouldn't be enough.I shouldn't be lazy though, I should use getter and setters as a workaround. I'll give that a go later today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, didn't wanted to put more work on your head 😸. Thanks for going the extra mile -- I really enjoy using wxt, especially since one can see this attention put into those small little details.